In Monterey 22/2/2002, the "disjoint with"
relationship was decided.
In the sequence, disjointness declarations are required
whereever applicable.
I propose the following "disjoint with" relations in
the CIDOC CRM. As the CIDOC CRM in general does not constrain multiple
instantiation, this construct allows to exclude some obvious cases. The
relationship is symmetric and inherited. I.e. if Persistent Item is disjoint
with Temporal Entity, all subclasses of Persistent Item are disjoint with
all subclasses of Temporal Entity and vice a versa. Therefore, I refer
those relationships only once, and top-down. Any other notation would
cause great confusion. As we support recall over precision, it would be
worse to have one disjoint declaration too much than one too less. We
have done without disjopintness declarations long enough. In this sense,
the following list is comprehensive, to the degree we could decide without
doubts about disjointness.
Assuming: Type isA Conceptual
Object, Legal Object isA Stuff
E2 Temporal Entity Disjoint with:
- Persitent Item
- Place
- Dimension
- Time-Span
- Primitive Value
E77 Persistent Item Disjoint with:
- Place
- Dimension
- Time-Span
- Primitive Value
E53 Place Disjoint with:
- Dimension
- Time-Span
- Primitive Value
E54 Dimension Disjoint with:
- Time-Span
- Primitive Value
E52 Time-Span Disjoint with:
- Primitive Value
E39 Actor disjoint with:
- E24 Physical Man-Made Stuff
- E73 Information Object
- E41 Appellation
- E51 Contact Point
- E55 Type
E56 Language disjoint with:
- Material
- Measurement Unit
E57 Material disjoint with:
- Measurement Unit
MD 19/6/2002
Current Proposal
In Monterey a proposal was accepted to declare all
disjoint classes in order to aid comprehnsion of the CRM (See issue
66), and Martin has now produced a draft list of disjoint class declarations.
However, after reviewing Martin's draft list I realized that it was
not
(nor intended to be) comprehensive, and that it will be a significant
and
time-consuming intellectual undertaking to produce a fully comprehensive
list of all disjoint class declarations. It almost certainly couldn't
be
done in time for the Copenhagen meeting.
So, we need to ask ourselves whether an incomplete list of disjoint
class
declarations is sufficiently useful and comprehsible to include in the
CRM, or whether we should abandon the idea of disjoint class
declararations altogether? In view of the time constraints we are facing,
I am proposing the latter -- that we do not include an incomplete list
of
disjoint class declarations in the CRM.
TG 20/6/2002
Proposal 2 accepted. Issue open until scope notes written.
Copenhagen 3/7/2002
Here the scope notes:
E2 Temporal Entity
Subclass of:
CRM Entity
Superclass of:
Condition State
Period
New Scope note:
This is an abstract entity and has no examples.
It groups together transient phenomena such as events, states and
others, which are limited in time, also called perdurants. It is
specialized into Period, which holds on some geographic area, and
Condition State, which holds for, on, or over a certain object.
Even though Persitent Items (or endurants) have a limited existence
in time, because they may be destroyed, lost or forgotten, we regard
them as disjoint from Temporal Enties, as their persistent identity
allows to relate Temporal Entities in which they participate.
E77 Persistent Item
Subclass of:
CRM Entity
Superclass of:
Stuff Contact Point Appellation Actor
New Scope note:
E77 Persistent Item encompasses (and thereby isolates) entities
which share two attributes: having the potential to exist over a
period of time, and having persistent identity during this period
of existence. These attributes are intended to apply to both
concrete objects, whether animate or inanimate and to ideas or concepts.
Hypothetical or imaginary objects fall within this category insofar
as they can be considered as conceptual objects i.e. E77 Persistent
Item
is not intended to be restricted to physical existence. Persistent
Items
are also called endurants.
The conditions under which an object can be deemed to maintain
its identity are often difficult to establish - the decision depends
largely on the judgement of the observer. Most people would agree,
for example, that a building ceases to exist if it is dismantled
and the materials reused in a different configuration. Human beings,
on the other hand, in common with many other organisms, go through
radical and profound changes during their life-span, affecting both
material composition and form, yet preserve their identity. But
also material objects in daily use also undergo material changes
due to maintenance etc. without changing identity. Identity in
these cases would seem to depend more on continuity rather than
the presence of any particular physical state or component.
The main classes of objects which fall outside the scope of
E77 Persistent Item are Temporal Entities such as periods, events
and
acts, and descriptive properties, (such as dimensions) which function
as adjectives and adverbs. The latter depend in there identity
on the object they are assigned to. The former acquire an identity
only through the changes participating Persistent Items undergo,
but not
out of their own form or substance. We regard them as disjoint from
Temporal Entities.
Physical stuff is an abstract notion that groups all
physical objects, man-made and natural, as well as physical features
of objects, such as holes. We use the term 'feature' to refer to
anything of a material nature, such as scratches, holes, rivers,
and stains, which it would be strange to refer to as ?objects?.
New Scope note:
Physical stuff is an abstract notion that groups all
physical objects, man-made and natural, as well as physical features
of objects, such as holes. We use the term 'feature' to refer to
anything of a material nature, such as scratches, holes, rivers,
and stains, which it would be strange to refer to as ?objects?.
Physical stuff is disjoint from E28 Conceptual Object, the immaterial
products. The latter are exclusively man-made. Physical stuff can
only be present at one place at a time, whereas conceptual objects
may be present at multiple places at a time via multiple physical
carriers. Physical stuff ceases to exist by destruction, whereas
conceptual objects ceases to exist by loss of the last carrier or
by forgetting.
Examples: Me, the Cave of Dirou in Peloponnese, the Euphrat River,
Lassie the dog, the logbook of the Endeavor.
E28 Conceptual Object
Subclass of:
Man-Made Stuff
Superclas of:
Right
Information Object
Type
Scope note:
This entity is the attempt to group the non-material
products of our minds, and specifically to allow for reasoning about
their identity, circumstances of creation and historical implications.
Characteristically, these things are created, invented or thought,
and somehow documented or communicated between persons. Conceptual
objects need not have a particular carrier, but may be found on
several different carriers, such as paper, electronic signals, marks,
audio media, paintings, photos, human memory, etc. They cannot be
destroyed as long as they exist on at least one carrier or in memory.
Examples include texts, maps, photos, music, sounds, fairy tales,
signs, patterns, symbols, plans, rights, and rules. A greater distinction
could be made between products having a clear identity, such as
a specific text, or photographs, and the ideas and concepts shared
and traded by groups of people.
New Scope Note:
This entity is the attempt to group the non-material
products of our minds and of technical processes such as image taking,
and specifically to allow for reasoning about their identity, circumstances
of creation and historical implications. Characteristically, these
things are created, invented or thought, and somehow documented
or communicated between persons and technical means of communication.
Conceptual objects need not have a particular carrier, but may be
found on several different carriers, such as paper, electronic signals,
marks, audio media, paintings, photos, human memory, etc. They cannot
be destroyed as long as they exist on at least one carrier or in
memory. Examples include texts, maps, photos, music, sounds, fairy
tales, signs, patterns, symbols, plans, rights, rules, types, taxa
and other concepts. A greater distinction is made between products
having a clear identity, such as a specific text, or photographs,
the Information Objects and the ideas and concepts shared and traded
by groups of people. Conceptual objects are disjoint from physical
stuff, the material things. The latter may be man-made or not. Physical
stuff can only be present at one place at a time, whereas conceptual
objects may be present at multiple places at a time via multiple
physical carriers.
Examples: The contents of "Definition of the CIDOCobject-oriented
Conceptual Reference Model, version 3.3.2, Sept.2002", the
copyright by CIDOC on the latter, the species fringilla coelebs,
the sound track of The Beatles "Yellow Submarine", Albrecht
Durer's signature, Unicorn.
16/10/2002
Outcome
Solution in version 3.3.2 accepted. Text in introduction
needs rewording.