Issue 557: Which family model should classes (i) Provision and (ii) Business Obligation appear under?
In the 50th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 43nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, upon discussing issue 420, the SIG resolved to start a new issue where to determine what is the most appropriate CRM extension to host classes socExx Provision and socExx Business Obligation plus the set of relevant properties whereby to link from and to them.
The definitions of the classes and their examples have been agreed upon in the context of issue 420.
The two classes could either become part of the new extension for Activity Plans and Business Transactions (see issue 419) or they could lie in the newly-defined scope of CRMsoc.
HW for AK, MD, TV, SdS, FB to work on the properties and examples.