Issue 8: Do physical feature and its decomposition need to be more rigidly defined?
ID:
8
Starting Date:
2001-07-05
Working Group:
1
Status:
Done
Closing Date:
2002-07-05
Background:
Do physical feature and its decompositon need to be more rigidly defined?
Current Proposal:
In scope, done.
Outcome:
In version 3.0, the property:
E19 Physical Object. is composed of (forms part of): Physical Object
has been redirected to:
E18 Physical Stuff. is composed of (forms part of): Physical Stuff In order to include "E26 Physical Feature".
Barcelona 5/7/2001