Issue 480: AP14 justified (is justification of)
In the 46th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 39th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting and upon resolving the issue 474 new issue appeared regarding how to link the inference that two stratigraphic volumes in a given topological relation of physical adjacency justify a stratigraphic (i.e. temporal) relation between the events that produced them.
Proposed alternatives for AP14: it either connects instances of physical adjacency and stratigraphic relations or it should be replaced by some construct in CRMinf.
The sig assigned to MD to make a proposal.
Athens, February 2020
Posted by Martin on 15/02/2021
Here is my HW for CRMarchaeo
In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig decided to relabel AP14 justified (is justification of) to AP13.2 is justified by (is justification of), on the grounds that it links properties and not classes -which is what the .2 stresses. The label changed as it reads nicer (addition of "is"). The cardinality is to be left as is for the moment (many-to-many) and to be reworked on a separate issue.
The details can be found here.
The issue is closed